Mono cropping is a common practice in agriculture, and usually causes serious economic losses due to soil degeneration, decreased crop yield and quality, and increased disease incidence, and pest occurance. It mainly due to changes in soil microbial communities, nutrient availability, and allelopathy effect. Recently, progressive studies have illustrated the mechanisms of mono cropping obstacles, and valid strategies to overcome them. Crop rotation and inter-cropping, choosing resistant cultivars, and biological management are only a few strategies for overcoming the drawbacks of mono cropping. Crop rotation is the most established and traditional agronomic technique for maintaining water and nutrient balance; avoiding disease; insect, pest, and weed control; and boosting crop production. Intercropping has been proven to increase yield and plant development, and it can help with serious issues, including small crop production, buildup of pests and diseases, soil deterioration, and environmental contamination. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that the major Benefits of intercropping include the reduction of pests and diseases, the improvement of the efficiency of soil resource use, and the improvement of soil nutrient absorption. Overall, a multi-pronged approach that incorporates soil amendments, crop rotation, and intercropping, along with a deeper understanding of plant–microbe relations and stress responses, may help us to overcome the obstacles associated with mono cropping. Therefore, Crop rotation, intercropping, and soil amendments to maintain soil fertility and promote healthy plant growth, so that they can develop sustainable cropping practices to minimize these effects. By improving soil health, farmers can maintain high crop yields and ensure the viable crop production.
| Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13 |
| Page(s) | 192-197 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Crop Rotation, Intercropping, Mono Cropping, Soil Fertility
| [1] | Bai, T., Xu, S., Rupp, F., Fan, H., Yin, K., Guo, Z., Zhang, L., Yang, B., Huang, Y., Li, Y. and Li, X., 2019. Temporal variations of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 population in a heavily infected banana field in Southwest China. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Science, 69(7), pp. 641-648. |
| [2] | Bojo, J. and Cassells, D., 1995. Land degradation and rehabilitation in Ethiopia. A Reassessment.‖ World Bank. Washington DC. |
| [3] | Dale, P. F. and McLaughlin, J. D., 1988. Land information management: an introduction with special reference to cadastral problems in Third World countries. |
| [4] | Dalsgaard, J. P. T. and Prein, M., 1999. Integrated smallholder agriculture-aquaculture in Asia: optimizing trophic flows. Nutrient Disequilibria in Agro ecosystems: Concepts and Case Studies. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 141-155. |
| [5] | Davies, S. W., Turmaine, M., Cozens, B. A., DiFiglia, M., Sharp, A. H., Ross, C. A., Scherzinger, E., Wanker, E. E., Mangiarini, L. and Bates, G. P., 1997. Formation of neuronal intranuclear inclusions underlies the neurological dysfunction in mice transgenic for the HD mutation. Cell, 90(3), pp. 537-548. |
| [6] | Devendra, C. and Thomas, D., 2002. Smallholder farming systems in Asia. Agricultural systems, 71(1-2), pp. 17-25. |
| [7] | Doran, J. W. and Parkin, T. B., 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, (defining soil qua), pp. 1-21. |
| [8] | Dröschmeister, R. A. I. N. E. R. and Sukopp, U. L. R. I. C. H., 2009. Indicators and conservation policy: the German Sustainability Indicator for Species Diversity as an example. Avocetta, 33(2), pp. 149-156. |
| [9] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2008. An international technical workshop Investing in sustainable crop 602 intensification The case for improving soil health. Integrated Crop Management 603 (Vol. 6). Rome: FAO. |
| [10] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2018. Food outlook. Available at http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/en/ (verified 1 December 2019). |
| [11] | German environmental organization Nature And Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU), 2017. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809 October 18, 2017. |
| [12] | Geneva, S., 2013. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014. Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Climate Change, 8. |
| [13] | Heap, I., 2019. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Weed Science. org. Accessed: March, 27, p. 2019. |
| [14] | Hurni, H., 1988. Degradation and conservation of the resources in the Ethiopian highlands. Mountain research and development, pp. 123-130. |
| [15] | Liebman, M. and Davis, A. S., 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. WEED RESEARCH-OXFORD-, 40(1), pp. 27-48. |
| [16] | Lightfoot, C. and Noble, R., 1993. A participatory experiment in sustainable agriculture. |
| [17] | Mulugeta, L., 2004. Effects of land use changes on soil quality and native flora degradation and restoration in the highlands of Ethiopia: Implication for sustainable land management. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Science. |
| [18] | Nye, P. H. and Greenland, D. J., 1960. The soil under shifting cultivation Technical Communication no. 51. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Harpenden, Royaume-Uni. |
| [19] | Olofsdotter, M., Navarez, D., Rebulanan, M. and Streibig, J. C., 1999. Weed-suppressing rice cultivars--does allelopathy play a role?. Weed research, 39(6), pp. 441-454. |
| [20] | Phelan, K. M., Black and Decker Inc, 1995. Hand-held vacuum cleaner. U. S. Patent Application 29/009, 939. |
| [21] | Ryszkowski, L., Szajdak, L. and Karg, J., 1998. Effects of continuous cropping of rye on soil biota and biochemistry. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 17(2), pp. 225-244. |
| [22] | Singh, M. P., 2015, June. Norms as a basis for governing sociotechnical systems. In Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. |
| [23] | Sitko, K., Rusinowski, S., Kalaji, H. M., Szopiński, M. and Małkowski, E., 2017. Photosynthetic efficiency as bioindicator of environmental pressure in A. halleri. Plant physiology, 175(1), pp. 290-302. |
| [24] | Stoorvogel, J. J. and Smaling, E. M. A., 1990. Assessment of soil nutrient depletion in Sub-Saharan Africa: 1983-2000. Vol. 1: Main report (No. 28). SC-DLO. |
| [25] | Thornton, T., 1997. Attitudes towards the relevance of biological, behavioural and social sciences in nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(1), pp. 180-186. |
| [26] | United Nations General Assembly, 2017. “Report of the Special Reporter on the Right to Food.”Human Rights Council, 34th Session. January 24, 1–24. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G17/017/85/PDF/G1701785.pdf?OpenElement. |
| [27] | Wang, F., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Hu, C. and Liu, B., 2018. Long-term nitrogen fertilization elevates the activity and abundance of nitrifying and denitrifying microbial communities in an upland soil: implications for nitrogen loss from intensive agricultural systems. Frontiers in microbiology, 9, p. 2424. |
| [28] | Nielson, H. H., 2009. The role of cassava in smallholder maize marketing in Zambia and Mozambique. Michigan State University. |
APA Style
Belete, T., Yadete, E. (2023). Effect of Mono Cropping on Soil Health and Fertility Management for Sustainable Agriculture Practices: A Review. Journal of Plant Sciences, 11(6), 192-197. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13
ACS Style
Belete, T.; Yadete, E. Effect of Mono Cropping on Soil Health and Fertility Management for Sustainable Agriculture Practices: A Review. J. Plant Sci. 2023, 11(6), 192-197. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13
AMA Style
Belete T, Yadete E. Effect of Mono Cropping on Soil Health and Fertility Management for Sustainable Agriculture Practices: A Review. J Plant Sci. 2023;11(6):192-197. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13,
author = {Tegegn Belete and Eshetu Yadete},
title = {Effect of Mono Cropping on Soil Health and Fertility Management for Sustainable Agriculture Practices: A Review},
journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
volume = {11},
number = {6},
pages = {192-197},
doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20231106.13},
abstract = {Mono cropping is a common practice in agriculture, and usually causes serious economic losses due to soil degeneration, decreased crop yield and quality, and increased disease incidence, and pest occurance. It mainly due to changes in soil microbial communities, nutrient availability, and allelopathy effect. Recently, progressive studies have illustrated the mechanisms of mono cropping obstacles, and valid strategies to overcome them. Crop rotation and inter-cropping, choosing resistant cultivars, and biological management are only a few strategies for overcoming the drawbacks of mono cropping. Crop rotation is the most established and traditional agronomic technique for maintaining water and nutrient balance; avoiding disease; insect, pest, and weed control; and boosting crop production. Intercropping has been proven to increase yield and plant development, and it can help with serious issues, including small crop production, buildup of pests and diseases, soil deterioration, and environmental contamination. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that the major Benefits of intercropping include the reduction of pests and diseases, the improvement of the efficiency of soil resource use, and the improvement of soil nutrient absorption. Overall, a multi-pronged approach that incorporates soil amendments, crop rotation, and intercropping, along with a deeper understanding of plant–microbe relations and stress responses, may help us to overcome the obstacles associated with mono cropping. Therefore, Crop rotation, intercropping, and soil amendments to maintain soil fertility and promote healthy plant growth, so that they can develop sustainable cropping practices to minimize these effects. By improving soil health, farmers can maintain high crop yields and ensure the viable crop production.
},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Mono Cropping on Soil Health and Fertility Management for Sustainable Agriculture Practices: A Review AU - Tegegn Belete AU - Eshetu Yadete Y1 - 2023/11/30 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 192 EP - 197 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13 AB - Mono cropping is a common practice in agriculture, and usually causes serious economic losses due to soil degeneration, decreased crop yield and quality, and increased disease incidence, and pest occurance. It mainly due to changes in soil microbial communities, nutrient availability, and allelopathy effect. Recently, progressive studies have illustrated the mechanisms of mono cropping obstacles, and valid strategies to overcome them. Crop rotation and inter-cropping, choosing resistant cultivars, and biological management are only a few strategies for overcoming the drawbacks of mono cropping. Crop rotation is the most established and traditional agronomic technique for maintaining water and nutrient balance; avoiding disease; insect, pest, and weed control; and boosting crop production. Intercropping has been proven to increase yield and plant development, and it can help with serious issues, including small crop production, buildup of pests and diseases, soil deterioration, and environmental contamination. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that the major Benefits of intercropping include the reduction of pests and diseases, the improvement of the efficiency of soil resource use, and the improvement of soil nutrient absorption. Overall, a multi-pronged approach that incorporates soil amendments, crop rotation, and intercropping, along with a deeper understanding of plant–microbe relations and stress responses, may help us to overcome the obstacles associated with mono cropping. Therefore, Crop rotation, intercropping, and soil amendments to maintain soil fertility and promote healthy plant growth, so that they can develop sustainable cropping practices to minimize these effects. By improving soil health, farmers can maintain high crop yields and ensure the viable crop production. VL - 11 IS - 6 ER -
Plant Science Department, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia
Plant Science Department, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia
