Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is Ethiopia's second-most important fruit crop. It is, nevertheless, in its infancy when compared to the potential of the nation. The mango is a succulent stone fruit that is a member of the Panes Mangifera fruit family, which includes several tropical fruit trees of the Anacardiaceous flowering plant family. To examine the present status and potential future of mango in Ethiopian studies. Mango value chains also promote growth, introduce new technologies, provide jobs, and lessen poverty in communities. The mango fruit crop is also very important since it has the ability to be processed industrially and sold in both domestic and international markets. However, due to poor handling, insufficient transportation and storage facilities, disease issues, and susceptibility to low storage temperatures, mango fruit production, marketing, and consumption are constrained. There is a very low level of farmer information regarding orchard spacing, pruning, fertilizer application, availability of new varieties, and pest and disease control. Mango packaging and delivery fell well short of expectations. The main obstacles were pests, knowledge and skill gaps, and the availability of better cultivars. Other agricultural inputs included fertilizers and pesticides. A total of 76.9% of growers were similar, according to an assessment of commonalities in the off-farming system, mango production practices, harvest, post-harvest handling, marketing, and their restrictions. Thus, to develop the mango sector in Ethiopia, it will be essential to improve the pre- and post-production techniques, use and/or conservation of the identified cultivars, and address the constraints.
Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 12, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14 |
Page(s) | 21-29 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Potential, Value Chain, Marketing, Fertilizer Mango Productivity
[1] | Aithal. A and Wangila. J., 2006: Rapid Assessment of fruit markets in Ethiopia based on research in Addis Ababa, Mekele and Awassa: Final report for Improving Productivity and Market Successes (IPMS) for Ethiopian Farmer Project, Addis Ababa. World Agro-forestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi. |
[2] | Akinnifesi, F. k., Leakey, R. R. B., Ajayi, O. C., Sileshi, G., Tchoundjeu, z., Matakala, P., and kwesiga, F. R., 2008 Indigenous fruit trees in the tropics: domestication, utilization and commercialization, CAB International, Wallingford, U k, in association with the World Agro-forestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. |
[3] | Alizar. A., 2007. Horticultural Marketing in Ethiopia, Faculty of Business and Economics, Master of Business Administration, Addis Ababa University. |
[4] | Amur. M. H., 2002 Ethiopia, the Sudan, the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and Somalia: Status of irrigation and drainage, future developments and capacity building needs in drainage. In International Programme for Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage (IIPTRID): Capacity Building for Drainage in North Africa. IIPTRID capacity building report. FAO, Rome, 121-143. |
[5] | Ayelech. T., 2011: market chain analysis of fruits for Goma woreda, Jimma zone, Oromia regional state; A Thesis Submitted to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University. |
[6] | Baldwin. E. and Mitra. S., 1997 Post harvest physiology and storage of tropical and subtropical fruits. International Wallingford, UK 85-122. |
[7] | Bezabih. E., 2010. Market Assessment and Value Chain Analysis in Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia; Final Report, SID-Consult-Support Integrated Development, June, 2010; Addis Ababa. |
[8] | CSA., 2009. Agricultural sample survey: report on area and production for major crops, stastical bulletin 427. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[9] | CSA., 2013. Agricultural Sample Survey 2012 / 2013; Report on Area and Production of Major Crops, Statistical Bulletin Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[10] | Department of Agriculture., 1996. Development Guideline for Mango Production in the 8th National Economic and Social Development Plan (1997-2001) (translated from Thailand original), Bangkok. |
[11] | Desta. H, 2005. Export potential of Ethiopia processed fruit and vegetables, export promotion department of English, P., S. Jaffee and J. J. Okello. “Exporting out of Africa: The Kenya. |
[12] | Elias. A., 2007. Technical Assessment on Viability of Integrated Fruits Processing in Ethiopia; Master of sciences Thesis, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[13] | FAO, (Food and Agricultural Organization)., 2005. Addressing Marketing and Processing Constraints those Inhibit Agric-food exports, guide for Policy Analysts and Planners. Agricultural Service Bulletin Rome, Italy. |
[14] | FAO., 2009 Utilization of tropical foods: fruit and leaves. Food and nutrition paper, via delle terme dicaracalla, Rome, Italy. |
[15] | FAO., 2010. Technical guidelines on tropical fruit tree management in Ethiopia; Giuseppe De Bac Project GCP/ETH/073/ITA. |
[16] | FAO., 2009. Food and Agriculture Organization, STAT accessed July 2009. |
[17] | Haidar. J. and Demisse. T., 1999. Malnutrition and xeroph thal mia in rural communities of Ethiopia. East African Medical Journal. 10: 590-593. |
[18] | James. S, Chris. R and Joseph. K. K., 2008A nalysis of the Mango Value Chain from Homosha-Assosa to Addis Ababa; The Semwanga Centre for Agriculture and Food, World Vision Australia, Go Mango, September. |
[19] | Joosten. F., 2007. Development Strategy for Export Oriented Horticulture in Ethiopia http://library.wur.nl/way/bestanden. |
[20] | Kaplinsky. R and M. Morris., 2001. A Handbook for Value Chain Research Brigh ton, United Kingdom Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. |
[21] | Ma, X.; Wu, H.; Liu, L.; Yao, Q.; Wang, S.; Zhan, R.; Xing, S. and Zhou, Y., 2011. Poly phenolic comp. |
[22] | Olaniyan, A. O., 2004, General information about mango and citrus production in Nigeria Oec. 2004. |
[23] | Rosals. C. A., 2005. Skin color and pigment change during ripening and related post- harvest management of fruit. National Inc, USA. 321-345. |
[24] | Seid. H and Zeru. Y., 2013: Assessment of production potentials and constraints of mango (Mangifera indica) at Bati, Oromia zone, Ethiopia, International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 2307-4531. |
[25] | Tigist. D, Timoteos. H and Piet. V., 2009. A Bright Future for Small Fruit Farmers in Southern Ethiopia, SNV Netherlands Development Organization, Case Studies. |
[26] | Timoteos. H., 2009. Challenging Impossible-Looking Hurdles; SNV Netherlands Development Organization, Case Studies. |
[27] | Tiruneh. D, 2009. Value chain development of mango and highland fruits production, SNV Ethiopia. |
[28] | Vayssières J. F., Sinzogan A. A. C., Adandonon A., Coulibaly O and Bokonon Ganta A., 2012. In: (Eds.). |
[29] | Weinberger, k., Lumpkin, T. A., 2005 Horticulture for poverty alleviation – the un-funded revolution, Working Paper No. 15, AVRDC (The World Vegetable Center), Shanhua, N Taiwan. |
[30] | Yeshitela, TB and T. Nessel, 2004. Characterization and Classification of Mango Ecotypes Grown in Eastern Hararghe (Ethiopia). Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 19(2): 179-180. |
[31] | Yilma Tewodros, 2009. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. |
APA Style
Aga, G. W., Gagabo, S. Y. (2024). Review Status of Mango Production and Research in Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 12(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14
ACS Style
Aga, G. W.; Gagabo, S. Y. Review Status of Mango Production and Research in Ethiopia. J. Plant Sci. 2024, 12(1), 21-29. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14
AMA Style
Aga GW, Gagabo SY. Review Status of Mango Production and Research in Ethiopia. J Plant Sci. 2024;12(1):21-29. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14
@article{10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14, author = {Gamachu Wakgari Aga and Sisay Yohannes Gagabo}, title = {Review Status of Mango Production and Research in Ethiopia}, journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences}, volume = {12}, number = {1}, pages = {21-29}, doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20241201.14}, abstract = {Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is Ethiopia's second-most important fruit crop. It is, nevertheless, in its infancy when compared to the potential of the nation. The mango is a succulent stone fruit that is a member of the Panes Mangifera fruit family, which includes several tropical fruit trees of the Anacardiaceous flowering plant family. To examine the present status and potential future of mango in Ethiopian studies. Mango value chains also promote growth, introduce new technologies, provide jobs, and lessen poverty in communities. The mango fruit crop is also very important since it has the ability to be processed industrially and sold in both domestic and international markets. However, due to poor handling, insufficient transportation and storage facilities, disease issues, and susceptibility to low storage temperatures, mango fruit production, marketing, and consumption are constrained. There is a very low level of farmer information regarding orchard spacing, pruning, fertilizer application, availability of new varieties, and pest and disease control. Mango packaging and delivery fell well short of expectations. The main obstacles were pests, knowledge and skill gaps, and the availability of better cultivars. Other agricultural inputs included fertilizers and pesticides. A total of 76.9% of growers were similar, according to an assessment of commonalities in the off-farming system, mango production practices, harvest, post-harvest handling, marketing, and their restrictions. Thus, to develop the mango sector in Ethiopia, it will be essential to improve the pre- and post-production techniques, use and/or conservation of the identified cultivars, and address the constraints. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Review Status of Mango Production and Research in Ethiopia AU - Gamachu Wakgari Aga AU - Sisay Yohannes Gagabo Y1 - 2024/01/18 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 21 EP - 29 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241201.14 AB - Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is Ethiopia's second-most important fruit crop. It is, nevertheless, in its infancy when compared to the potential of the nation. The mango is a succulent stone fruit that is a member of the Panes Mangifera fruit family, which includes several tropical fruit trees of the Anacardiaceous flowering plant family. To examine the present status and potential future of mango in Ethiopian studies. Mango value chains also promote growth, introduce new technologies, provide jobs, and lessen poverty in communities. The mango fruit crop is also very important since it has the ability to be processed industrially and sold in both domestic and international markets. However, due to poor handling, insufficient transportation and storage facilities, disease issues, and susceptibility to low storage temperatures, mango fruit production, marketing, and consumption are constrained. There is a very low level of farmer information regarding orchard spacing, pruning, fertilizer application, availability of new varieties, and pest and disease control. Mango packaging and delivery fell well short of expectations. The main obstacles were pests, knowledge and skill gaps, and the availability of better cultivars. Other agricultural inputs included fertilizers and pesticides. A total of 76.9% of growers were similar, according to an assessment of commonalities in the off-farming system, mango production practices, harvest, post-harvest handling, marketing, and their restrictions. Thus, to develop the mango sector in Ethiopia, it will be essential to improve the pre- and post-production techniques, use and/or conservation of the identified cultivars, and address the constraints. VL - 12 IS - 1 ER -